« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 30, 2007

Bond Package Passes

The Connecticut General Assembly has passed a two-year bonding bill and Governor Rell has indicated that she will sign it when it reaches her desk. The compromise breaks an impasse that has held up payments to school contractors and delayed important public works programs across the state.

SB 1502 includes $90 million in grants for both FY08 and FY09 for the Clean Water Fund. It also authorizes $235 million in FY08 and $180 million in FY09 for Clean Water Fund revenue bonds for wastewater treatment plant upgrades and other clean water projects.

The bill includes a list of projects for the strategic transportation projects list, $150 million for a “fix-it-first” road and bridge program, and transit-oriented development projects. The bill also includes $275 million in FY08 and $173 million in FY09 in Special Transportation Obligation bonds.

A major building program for the Connecticut State University System will cost $950 million over nine years.

Future of CT Transportation Funding

Philip Smith, Undersecretary of the Office of Policy and Management, gave an interesting overview of the financing of Connecticut's transportation system in a presentation to the Governor's Commission on the Reform of DOT.
Click here.

October 29, 2007

Revision Cloud

Revisionclouds_3

October 24, 2007

Meeting with OPM

ACEC/CT President Bob Jurasin and I met with Secretary Robert Genuario of the Office of Policy and Management on Monday. This was primarily a meeting to reinforce our previous testimony before the Governor's Commission to Reform the DOT.

We discussed the selection method for DOT (Qualifications-Based Selection) and how it provides value to the state. We encouraged the Commission to greater transparency at DOT, particularly with regard to upcoming projects. The more firms know about upcoming projects, the better they can respond when being considered under the QBS system. It's a true win/win situation. What's holding it up? Lawyers in the state government want to avoid appearances of misconduct by providing more information to a potential contractor than others. If DOT can make this information available on their web site or at a publicaly announced meeting, then no firm has an unfair advantage.

We also discussed the delay in bonding, clean contracting standards board, clean water fund and the school construction coalition.

October 18, 2007

STill No Bond Package - Part II

Governor Rell and legislative leaders have yet to break the deadlock over the state's bond package for the two fiscal years which started last July. The impact is starting to be felt in municipalities which are in the midst of school building projects. Because they are not receiving their periodic payments, the municpalities are having to borrow money to pay contractors to continue the projects.

But other important public works projects are facing delays: clean water projects (See recent article in the Hartford Courant), mass transit, road and bridge repairs, DPW and state university projects may also be delayed if an agreement is not reached. I don't know if it is a scare tactic, but some legislators are considering the possibility that the state may not have a bond bill until next regular legislative session which does not begin until February, 2008.

October 10, 2007

Governor Signs Contracting Out Legislation

Governor Rell has signed SB1600, An Act Concerning Clean Contracting Standards, which passed the General Assembly last month during a special session. Legislators have been trying to pass variations of this legislation since the scandals of Governor Rowland. Governor Rell has vetoed the bill several times, but it has been watered down to meet many of the original objections to the legislation. Such controversial legislation would probably have died if it were not for the DOT’s I-84 scandal in recent months.

Although the bill has passed and been signed into law by the Governor, legislators haven’t seen the last of this issue. Immediately after the bill passed the Senate last month, legislators realized that they had passed the wrong legislation. In fact they had included a revised bill in another bill they passed only hours later. But that bill, the famous “bond package” was vetoed by the Governor and is currently being negotiated. Therefore, what we see in this bill is likely to be changed in future legislation.

Having said that here’s a brief summary of the bill. If you want a longer summary click here. The full text can be found here.

The new law creates a State Contracting Standards Board (SCSB) with far-reaching powers to establish procurement policy and standards for state agencies, quasi-public agencies and municipal projects using state funds. The SCSB’s 14 members must have experience in procurement and related issues (including engineering) and will be appointed by the Governor and legislative leaders. The Board will appoint an executive director and chief procurement officer, hire staff and contract for services.

The SCSB’s powers include reviewing, monitoring and auditing state contracting procurement processes. The Board has the power to suspend state contractors and cancel contracts. It can invalidate a state contract if it finds that state law has been broken. The SCSB will review state contracting statutes, regulations and policies and recommend changes. It will audit each state agency at least every three years and issue a public report. All state contracts must include provisions to ensure accountability, transparency, and results-based outcomes, as prescribed by the SCSB.

By far, the most controversial aspect of this legislation has been the privatization provisions of Section 16. Before privatizing any state service that is not currently privatized, a state contracting agency must develop a cost-benefit analysis and a business case. During floor debate on this bill, legislators said that the privatization provision would not include services which are currently being performed by both state workers and private contractors. An example mentioned was snow plowing. This service is performed by both DOT employees and contracted out. The DOT could continue to contract out this service without having to go through the lengthy cost-benefit analysis and business case analysis. There are additional restrictions placed on privatization contracts for “essential government services” such as inspections. The privatization contract provisions would appear to apply only to very large contracts which result in layoffs of state employees. In those cases, the final decision rests with the Governor and the General Assembly.

What will be the impact of this legislation for those doing business with the state? It depends on several factors. The SCSB may be able to standardize some contracting policies like the use of QBS by state agencies, quasi-public agencies and municipalities not now using QBS. This could be a major improvement for design professionals. But if the process is abused by state employee labor unions or disgruntled bidders, the legislation could add layers of delays to an already cumbersome contracting process. Anyone who disagrees with the SCSB’s decisions may appeal to the courts. How deeply the SCSB’s control of state contracting will reach into the bureaucracy remains to be seen. And don’t forget that the legislators will be amending the bill, probably before the regular session which begins in February, 2008.

October 05, 2007

Engineering Student Summit

Thursday, November 1, 2007, 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM (formal program), 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM (informal). The University of Hartford, Wilde Auditorium, Grey Conference Center, 200 Bloomfield Avenue, West Hartford, CT 06117. Park in visitor lots K or F. Registration: $25 per person. Please mail, fax or call in your reservation by Friday, October 26, 2007. Sponsorships available. Contact the ACEC/CT office at (860) 635-5522. Meeting registration forms and sponsorship forms available in column at right.

If you are concerned about the current shortage of engineers in our profession, This summit will bring educators, about 50 civil engineering students, and representatives of the consulting community together to exchange ideas on how to keep people in the profession and how to attract new students with activities that can reach as far back as junior high school and high school students.

Your attendance is critical for several reasons:

1. The more you know about these young people, the better prepared you and your firm will be to meet the challenges of the shortage of engineers.

2. We need to show engineering students the opportunities available in the consulting engineering industry.

3. We can explain what we need from engineering school graduates to faculty and administrators.

Our hosts will be:
Prof. Michael Accorsi – University of Connecticut
Prof. David Pines – University of Hartford
Prof. Gregory Broderick, P.E. – University of New Haven

A “town hall” meeting with the students will be the centerpiece of the program. Afterward we will have a time for informal discussion with students and faculty and have refreshments. Bring plenty of business cards!


My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad